Swap Blog » History

Verse of the Day

11/17/2008

Unsolved Knoxville murders

Filed under: Current / General, History, Local, News permalinktrackback — Team Swap @ 5:54 pm

The Knoxville New Sent. has had two stories in the last two days covering two possibly related and unsolved murders from the late 60’s and early 70’s in Knoxville. The first is about the urder of Rose Busch (a well known Knoxvillian and wife of a successful business owner Harry Busch who was having an affair Hazel Davidson - well known Knoxville “playgirl” and later madam) in 1968. The second is about the possibly related murder of Oscar Hugh “Buck” Willman (a local man known to work carnivals and who was involved in pornography and whose wife Henrietta Willman / “Cindy Ogle” was a local madam) in 1972. These two stories when combined read like a story line for a top rated TV drama or blockbuster movie / book. Heck there is premeditation, violence, questionable relationships, affairs, possible dirty cops and hired gunmen. Give them a read if you missed them in the local paper or if you are not from the Knoxville area.

11/11/2008

Thank You To All Vets

Filed under: Current / General, History, Personal, Politics permalinktrackback — Team Swap @ 9:41 am

We at Team Swap / Swap Blog would like to thank all the vets (past and present) who have put their lives, health and future in harms way to protect the lives, health and future of America. Your service is a appreciated here, even if others try to negate your purpose and call in the shifting winds of American politics.

10/7/2008

Happy 50th to the Smoot

Filed under: History, Misc, Personal, Technology permalinktrackback — Team Swap @ 2:11 pm

It seems that this is the 50th anniversary of the Smoot - a unit of measure that is 67 inches long (why 67 inches well read the story at msnbc.com here). Happy Anniversary Smoot from someone that is 1.0820896 smoots.

Smoot conversion here

9/19/2008

Winning the “popular vote”

Filed under: Current / General, History, Personal, Politics permalinktrackback — Team Swap @ 1:50 pm

Charles Kozierok writing at the Huffington Post (which is far from being called a instrument of the right) has a interesting and well thought out post up about the flaws in the argument that a president who wins in the electoral college but that does not garner the majority of votes (i.e. “win the popular vote”) is illegitimate. Kozierok does this via a baseball analogy and by pointing out the rules of game (i.e. becoming president) are not based on the number of votes you win, but the number of states (and DC) that you win. One can debate the ideas behind the system, but that is how the rules are established and how the game is played.

The fact that people are already beginning to look at a tied electoral college where the decision on who is the next president would be decided by Congress just reinforces how tight and how dramatic this race could become. If the decision goes to Congress the national uproar will be AMAZINGLY loud. I am really hoping there is not a tie in the electoral college. Then you could have a person have the majority of votes, win half the states or so, and still not be president.

9/15/2008

Rocking the Palms

Filed under: History, Misc, Technology permalinktrackback — Team Swap @ 3:07 pm

Though my one and only Palm was stolen / lost a few years ago I still miss the thing. Victor Agreda, Jr. of download squad is still in love with his and using his Palm regularly. Heck, he is still running (deep breath) Garnet (Palm 5.0). WOW WOW WOW. No Iphones with 3G connectivity dead apps and white screens of death here people.

For all of you soon to be long in the teeth geeks out there Victor’s post is a nice trip down memory lane to a time when Pilots described airplane captains, pens and PDA’s not small Honda’s and when someone talked about touchscreens they meant 160 X 160 grid overlays. Streaming data was measured in bytes not megabytes back then my kiddies.

Really nothing vs real news

Filed under: Current / General, Family, History, Misc, News, Personal, Politics permalinktrackback — Team Swap @ 2:34 pm

I find it sadly interesting that there are significantly more stories on and offline, in print and on the air already about the SNL skit where potential VP Palin was portrayed by Tina Fey, then about Sarah Palin’s son Track (seriously where did they get these kids names) - along with the rest of his battalion - deploying to Iraq last week.

Considering the SNL skit happened basically Sunday AM (i.e. roughly 36 hours ago), and on a weekend, compared to almost 5 days for the deployment story , which happened Thursday - on the anniversary of 9/11, then the number of stories / discussion buzz is even more interesting to me. One would think that the deployment of a child of the potential Vice President on the 7 anniversary of the worst attack on American soil by enemies of this nation in over 50 years would get a bit of buzz.

Like Sarah Palin, dislike her, etc isn’t it more news worthy that the son of the potential VP is leaving for war then if a comedy skit was accurate, funny, who wrote it, who was in it, what Palin thought of it, etc. Right or left, liberal or conservative, pro Palin or anti Palin, the number of stories about what really is a non event and something that will be forgotten by mid week compared to something that is truly unique in several generations,i.e. newsworthy, is a worrisome trend regarding the interests, ideals, and views of both the press and the average US citizen in my eyes.

Understand I am not blaming the press for this solely as they are only giving the people what the people want, but the press does deserve some blame as they have covered some stories in the past that are of no to little interest to the average America simply due to their value in history. I am also not saying that Governor Palin, her family or her son are any better then all the other soldiers families or soldiers that a deployed at war time, but they and their family are different due to her current position as a VP candidate. Additionally, understand I would say the same thing about both the press, it’s selection of stories, and the interests of the average American if a child of McCain, Obama or Biden were deploying. Bottom line, this is a significant event. It is one which is rarely seen today, and it is one that deserves more coverage then it has received.

Additionally, one should not bite at the seductive lure of respecting the privacy of the family either as modern politics / coverage of politics has included the detailed coverage of families members of candidates on both sides of the aisle for over 20 years now. With the exception of Al Gore son’s DUI (personally I still want to know how he got that Prius to over 100 but WHATEVER) dropping from the news in about 12 hours, the actions of family members of both sitting and potential Presidents and Vice Presidents ON BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE have been closely scrutinized / followed for over a generation now.

Basically, I am just lamenting our societal shift from long form news coverage to sound bites, and the public’s interest in celebrity over history, fun over work and the continuation of a disturbing trend toward more coverage / interest in historically unimportant things in relation to things that could potentially be historic. Uh uh, got to go, I have to go and check my Facebook account and see how my Mob Wars campaign is going.

8/25/2008

Chinese Olympics success may hurt Chinese people

Filed under: Current / General, History, News, Personal, Politics, Sports permalinktrackback — Team Swap @ 10:12 am

MSNBC has a nice post up this AM talking about exactly what I feared and believed would happen (post here and here) with China hosting the Olympics - the bevy of worldwide leaders who attended when combined with all the positive spin may actually lead to the leaders of China believing that they can ignore pressure to improve freedoms and human rights because world leaders remained silent on these matters. That gave the Chinese government the power and view that they can stay their current course and even toughen their stances without any real fear of economic or political reprisals.

“Not a single world leader who attended the Games or members of the International Olympic Committee seized the opportunity to challenge the Chinese government’s behavior in any meaningful way,” said Sophie Richardson, Asia advocacy director for the U.S.-based Human Rights Watch. “Will anyone wonder, after the games are over, why the Chinese government remains intransigent about human rights?”

Full post here

8/8/2008

The Olympic’s … not really interested this time

Filed under: Current / General, Faith, History, News, Personal, Politics, Sports permalinktrackback — Team Swap @ 8:32 pm

Well the 2008 Summer Olympics OFFICIALLY kick off tonight, they have been having preliminary rounds in some sports (like soccer) since Wednesday. Unfortunately I really don’t care that much any more. In fact, the winter Olympics seem far more important to me now then the summer ones. More on that later though.

This shift of the Olympics as been less important to me is a major shift for me as I use to look forward to the Olympics for months before they began, especially when athletes I follow would be in them. In years / decades past I would have been thinking about the Olympic cycling road race, track cycling, kayaking, the modern pentathlon, the cross country equestrian event, and a few others weeks before they occurred. The chance to see cyclists like Sarah Hammer, Levi Lephiheimer, Carlos Sastre, Cadel Evans, David Ziberiski, Taylor Phinney, and alike would have be a big deal to me. Heck, I would even be pondering fencing and sailing competitions at this point. I would have been thinking about the traditional big swimming and track events as well. Admittedly Micheal Phelps has been hard to miss, but outside of him there really has been little buzz in my mind about Olympic competition. Bottom line, today I am really just not that interested though I will still watch some of the Olympics hoping to see something that interest me.

I think there are three (3) major reasons that have lead to this shift in my view/ interest this year. First, it is the location of the Olympics. They are in China. China, regardless of the recent PR, is still the largest communist nation in the world, and one that poses a security threat to many nations (including the US). Additionally, it is a nation that oppresses it’s people political and religious freedom.

Freedom is neither free nor common in China and for the Olympics to honor one of the most oppressive nations in the world with the Olympic games (supposedly a bastion of freedom and quality) is a travesty. I understand the idea was to put pressure on China to change it’s ways via additional worldwide scrutiny. Unfortunately, it has not worked.

If anything China has locked down freedoms of both visitors and it’s citizens even more due to the games. There have been numerous stories about international news people being surveiled constantly, and being questioned about how much money they have in their pockets when they leave their hotels. Protests are only allowed if approved and approval is not going to be coming if the protest is large, controversial, or potentially embarrassing to China.

Never forget, this is a nation with mobile death vans (story here and here). A nation that many have allegedly deals in the organ trade business. A nation that oppresses ALL that oppose it. A nation that tells the rest of the world that they have no business to speak about what occurs when their country even though international money and business is common there. This is a nation that limits / filters the Internet - including banning this site. Honestly we are sort of proud of that. Bottom line, this is a nation that deals in smoke, mirrors, lies, oppression, and complete control. They have little to no interest in truly becoming free or allowing their citizens to be free. They only want to appear open, while still tightly controlling most of those within the nation.

Yes I know there is a growing Chinese middle class and I know that China has the most Internet users in the world. I know there are thousands of millionaires in China. I know about all of that and more. I also know about forced labor camps, one child per family, Tiananmen square, political and religious prisoners, despotic rulers, controlled official churches, and the death penalty for non violent crimes - including tax evasion.

I know Russia had the Olympics in 1980 and virtually fell apart by the end of the decade. It was not the Olympics that made this happen though - it was a combination of politics, society and economic forces which lead to a Russian collapse. China is not making the same mistakes Russia did. China’s move toward freedom will only come from a powerful international desire combined with the force of a oppressed internal people pushing for change. These Olympics are allowing a oppressive Chinese government to show a large part of the world a relatively “loose” public China. That does not move China down the road toward freedom.

Honestly, if I was president I would personally not go to the opening ceremonies. I understand we need to converse, meet and such but for the leader of the FREE world to grace China with a PR gold mine by attending the games is a bad idea to me. IF I was president and I chose to attend for some reason I would begin the answer to EACH and EVERY question about China with something like “Well the communist Chinese” or “The communist nation of China” or “The oppressive Chinese government” or “The Chinese opponents of freedom and equality”. I know the state department, and many others, would hate me, but hey they work for me and my policy and views on China is suppose to be carried out by them. Of course any real student of government knows that the actual bureaucrat’s do not change election to election, so little on the ground in terms of personality and purpose changes regularly in the Federal bureaucracy. Bottom line I understand there needs to be a flexible policy toward China, but I think the presidents job is to hold a harder line publicly while flexibility is done behind the scenes.

Moving on, the second reason I am really not interested in these Olympics is the the lack of order and schedule from NBC. I understand there is a lot to cover but NBC is making it hard to find what you want to see and when it is on. With scheduling like -

Olympic Schedule Example

Olympic Schedule Example

or -

Olympic Schedule Ex 1

Olympic Schedule Ex 1

Olympic Schedule 2

Olympic Schedule 2

it is virtually impossible short of having 5 DVR’s to actually catch what you want to see and then watch it or to even know if it is going to be on or not. I think the plan is for a person to regularly check for updates and su